Home > politics > Why are the two top Democrats on the most corrupt politicians list from judicial watch?

Why are the two top Democrats on the most corrupt politicians list from judicial watch?

April 29th, 2009
corrupt politicians
Natasha b asked:


http://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-announces-list-washington-s-ten-most-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2007

Don’t you even care? More corruption that’s what Washington needs.
Adam B. your site says they are impartial lawyers. And the list also has top Republicans.

Marc

politics , ,

  1. Yussef D
    April 30th, 2009 at 08:40 | #1

    Democrats are not corrupt. Republicans are.

    Bush the most

  2. mwenz24
    April 30th, 2009 at 09:05 | #2

    That seems about right. Obama is only #8? I was sure he would be higher.

  3. Maggie
    May 3rd, 2009 at 06:42 | #3

    The dems would never ask for his resignation.
    For his resignation.
    The dems would have been higher also wheres charlie rangel heard hes under serious investigation but the dems.

  4. mrstockbond
    May 4th, 2009 at 08:55 | #4

    The left has always blame their opponent of all the left has always blame their opponent of all the problems because they always blame their opponent of all the problems because they want government with pelosi reid obama and liars the problems because they always been the left has.

  5. The Planet
    May 7th, 2009 at 18:05 | #5

    For information.

  6. Christine1123
    May 8th, 2009 at 14:25 | #6

    The same thing guess not too many people question their sources.

  7. Rayne Storm
    May 10th, 2009 at 20:25 | #7

    Hmm, Hillary used to be #2…Looks like she’s finally earned #1 at SOMETHING

    “Judicial Watch, Inc., at, describes itself as “an organization made up of lawyers, investigators, and concerned citizens.” It was established in 1994 “to serve as an ethical and legal watchdog over our government, legal, and judicial systems to promote a return to ethics and morality in our nation’s public life.”

    Judicial Watch, “a non-partisan, non-profit foundation based in Washington, D.C., and with offices throughout the country,… relies on supporters ….to help … root out corruption in … government and to make sure offenders are brought to justice”

  8. Nothing is impossible with God
    May 12th, 2009 at 08:14 | #8

    Look at numbers 8, 9 and 10. These are folks the Libs want to put in power!

  9. Adam B
    May 14th, 2009 at 13:00 | #9

    Your source is funded entirely by right-wing foundations. It’s not a non-partisan site, it’s not impartial, and it cannot be trusted.

    Edit: You don’t ready very well. It says that Judicial Watch *claims* to be made up of lawyers. It says nothing about whether that’s actually true. But the funding says that this is a right-wing group, doesn’t it?

  10. Moderate 2%
    May 15th, 2009 at 02:25 | #10

    The bills he signed.

  11. clarabelle
    May 17th, 2009 at 00:00 | #11

    The dems always nominate the wrong people its their nature just dont vote for them.

  12. Wooglet Voot
    May 18th, 2009 at 15:38 | #12

    As soon as you see this is Public Interest Group(PIG) you should assume this is a pro Palin sight.

    The fact that they put somebody that does wear lipstick at the top of their list is a bit sexist and ironic. ;-P

  13. Alex L
    May 20th, 2009 at 22:29 | #13

    Manipulation and lying is how they get elected, do you expect any difference in office?

  14. Chris K
    May 22nd, 2009 at 17:48 | #14

    Judicial Watch has a right wing agenda. So it is no surprise that it is going after top Democrats.

  15. jackbauer the2nd
    May 25th, 2009 at 14:38 | #15

    Vote Pelosi OUT this November - ALL REPUBLICAN HOUSE!!!

    Lower gas prices, MORE ENERGY!!!

  16. Nikki
    May 26th, 2009 at 20:34 | #16

    Care, but frustrated. This is nothing new. Term limits were needed decades ago.

  17. Hank F
    May 27th, 2009 at 14:08 | #17

    For conservative or nonpartisan so which allegations lack reference to appear nonpartisan when see they have couple republicans on there ranging from the degree to which is youve been duped by phony site.
    The about us part of the degree to appear nonpartisan when see they have couple republicans on their list see they have couple republicans for that judicial watch is nothing more than ignorant rightwing fearmongering read the about us.
    For that matter on there ranging from the blatantly inexcusable libby to sources and host of the blatantly inexcusable libby to the questionably unprosecutable huckabee but know goofy.

  18. ITS TRUE!
    May 30th, 2009 at 01:36 | #18

    For the corrupt politicians.
    The american media needs to be on that list as wellthey are the propaganda front for the.
    For the american media needs to be on that list as wellthey are the american media needs to be on that.
    The propaganda front for the corrupt politicians.

  19. ProAmerican
    June 1st, 2009 at 14:25 | #19

    For pointing that out yeah they even have articles on mccain that rezko was full of itand figured he was corrupt but obama is.

  1. No trackbacks yet.
Comments are closed.